WebMatrix, ASP.NET Razor, IIS Developer Express, SQL Server Compact Edition - What is Microsoft objective behind these new technologies?


WebMatrix, ASP.NET Razor, IIS Developer Express, SQL Server Compact Edition - What is Microsoft objective behind these new technologies?



Recently Microsoft (via Scottgu) has announced some new technologies (WebMatrix, ASP.NET Razor, IIS Developer Express, SQL Server Compact Edition). I think this is something new direction in which Microsoft is trying to move since launching of ASP.NET MVC. I think the clear target of these new moves are Ruby/Python/PHP/.. developers or current ASP.NET developers who are thinking to move to Ruby/Python/PHP. What's your opinion?

Will Microsoft be successful in its objective?


Value from Hidden Input field as an Actionlink Parameter

1:

How to send jQuery $.get so the Model Binder can bind a string to a parameter?
The objective is clearly to lower to bar of entry for new developers. Adding check boxes to each row on MVCcontrib GridGetting a .Net-based website has never been easier and by adding the PHP support they must tempt PHP developers by offering a familiar face in a new environment. Html Helpers generates ID from model properties. How do I target 1 particular element with JavaScript and CSS if many elements have the same ID?. Which is the preferred method of starting a form using HTML helpers? I think this will unleash a new wave of developers discovering .Net web development. asp.net mvc viewdata tempdata variable. Linq-To-Sql, MVC, Enumerable results with Distinct query
Add another propertymapping? (AutoMapper)

2:

I disagree this WebMatrix is only useful for not-particularly-programmers or novice developers. It is (especially this Razor thing) incredibly useful for developing "one-liner" websites of non-production quality (e. g. to demonstrate any feature or just to provide a test web service for programmer's needs).. I hadn't used WebMatrix enough yet, although it already seems this I must create 50% of a simple web calculator before VS2010 even starts up :-) .

3:

Seems to me this its substantially aimed at people who are not particularly programmers - web development for SuperUser.com perhaps? (c.f. the link to Scott Hanselman's blog in my comment to the question) And who don't necessarily want to be "developers" although did want to have any capabilities to go beyond plain HTML.. Its also aimed at demonstrating this there is a complete stack and further this you must deploy applications using this stack to shared hosting without incurring additional costs (which is a new feature enabled by the new release of SQL Server Compact Edition). Last its an entry point for those who might want to be developers - if you're talking around "developing" a website or a web application its not always the case this the programming involved is complicated . Without playing - I need to set up a VM so I must play in a sandbox - its hard to go further although WebMatrix is composed of a number of very capable tools and therefore offers considerable potential to develop apps beyond what is possible "out of the box"..

4:

Their goal: Simplify and court new developers. . Will they be succesfull: This seems to me one of the easiest ways to receive out a website so I don't see how this must fail. .

5:

In response to catbert's comment around WebMatrix being useful for non-production quality sites, I'd like to point out this Rob Conery and Scott Hanselman used WebMatrix to create their This Developer's Life podcast site. Which is not a heavy duty commercial production site, although is definitely not a demo site..


82 out of 100 based on 62 user ratings 262 reviews

@